The Islamic Hotline Phone _______ was created in Egypt __ the year 2000 with ___ vision of becoming the _____'_ foremost source of information ___ centrist Islamic teachings utilizing ___ mediums of telephone, and ___ internet..
Home Q & A About us FAQ Advertise Contact us   URDU Arabic
 
Q & A --> Faith and Doctrine --> The Aims of Jihad for the Sake of Allah

Question : A question was asked regarding the aims of Jihad for the sake of God.

Fatwa in Brief: Jihad against non-Muslims (kuffar) is obligatory if they have been given notification (balagh) and called either to worship God alone and to believe in Mohamed’s (upon him be peace) message, or to pay the poll tax (jizya).

Shaykh Ibn Baz, Risalat Fadl al-Jihad wal-Mujahidin, p. 12-15

Response:

The purpose of Jihad is to call people to embrace Islam. Fighting is not needed if we could do the call peacefully.

Commentary:

Jihad for the sake of God was defined as the war to promote God’s word and to spread the call for Islam.

It is generally considered a communal obligation (fard kifayah), and should be done through the ruler – not the individuals or groups – unless a specific Muslim community comes under direct attack in which case it may be considered as a personal obligation (fard ‘ayn) for every [sane, adult] male Muslim.

However, it should be made clear that forcing people to embrace Islam [coercion in matters of religion] is not allowed:

“Let there be no compulsion in religion: Truth stands out clear from Error”.

(Q. 2:256)

The purpose of Jihad is only to call people [to the faith] not coercion. If calling people to Islam could be effected peacefully, then there is no religious sanctification for fighting to promote any religion.

As Muslims, we are bound to support good and condemn evil to the best of our ability. We condemn the unjust killing of any human being, be it Muslim or non-Muslim. The sanctity of life is the cornerstone of Islam. “No one will be able to enter paradise if he has a palm full of blood he spilled” (Al-Bukhari 97152).

God says:

“Fight in the cause of Allah those who fight you but do not transgress limits”. (Q. 2: 190).

Islam is a message with an international appeal which must be delivered to the whole world. And in the past, this was only made possible through traveling the earth. However, because Islam was a new phenomenon, it is not surprising that the existing powers, protecting their authority at the time of Revelation, wished to fight against it. This was how people of all eras have always behaved. The new religion had to be defended so that its political presence stabilized, and its message was communicated. If the sword was once necessary to secure the call, these days it is not needed, except in defense against those who aim to harm Islam and its people (yuridun bil-Islam sharan wa ahlu).

These days Islam can spread without needing to fear danger from travel or from delivering the message globally. Muslims live in more countries than ever before. The media traverses boundaries, reaching people in their own houses, and it may not be limited through the closing of borders or doors. It is possible, therefore, for Muslims in foreign or non-Muslim lands to call all non-Muslims to embrace Islam using all available peaceful and legal means. Where this can be done without fear of reprisal or repression Muslims who live in foreign and non-Muslim lands should never resort to violence to achieve these aims. It is not justified to betray protections and freedoms provided in foreign or non-Muslim lands. For more people will embrace Islam when it is borne in peace and more will reject it when it is borne in violence. The Islamic call is voluntary, not obligatory. Our beliefs are never to be implemented through force. This is why God told Noah to ask his people: “Shall we compel you to accept it when ye are averse to it?” (Q. 11: 28). And God says to Mohamed (upon him be peace):

“Wilt thou then compel mankind against their will to believe!”. (Q. 10: 99)

When the Prophet (upon him be peace) sent ‘Ali to fight the Jews of Khaybar, he said: “Do I fight them until they become like us? By which he meant ‘do I force them to become Muslim?’ and the Prophet replied to him: “Move slowly unto you arrive in their quarters; then invite them to embrace Islam, and tell them of their duties to God. If Allah guides even one man to you [i.e. to become Muslim], it shall be better for you than if you were to take all their property” (narrated by Muslim). If texts exist, then, whose apparent meanings seems to indicate an absolute necessity to fight, there are plenty others that limit fighting to when an attack occurs, or as the penalty for breaking treatises of peace, or for thwarting an imminent attack. And the above are only examples of many.

And God knows best.

Dr. Anas Abu Shadi